One day a violent mob dragged a women on the street of Alexandria, abused and streeped her, beat her brutally with the stones and roffing tiles, they tored her body apart and burnt it. Why was young woman killed by mob ? Who was behind this brutal killing ? What wrong she had done?
Hypatia was the very beautifull daughter of Theon of Alexandria, a mathematician and astronomer who flourished in Alexandria. She was the last member or Alexandrian Museum, the museum foundy by Alexander and it was become as a center of culture and learning for the ancient world during the 331 B.C. Hypatia was popular lecturer on philosophical topics which attracts large audience in the Alexandrian museum. Hapatia was only woman who claim world's leading mathematicain and astronomer in the ancient history of Egypt.
Wearing a rough cynic philosopher's cloak she taught in public to an audience consisting of both pagans and Christians. Hyatia authored commentaries on Diphantus, on The Astronomical Canon and on Apollonius's Conics. Hypatia also collaborted with her father on a commentary of the third book of Ptolemy's Almagest since the text includes the phrase : This book was edited by the philosopher, my daughter Hypatia."
There is no doubt that Hyaptia was the leading matehematician of her time. However, it seems that no specific orignal contributions to mathematics or astronomy can be attributed indisputably to her. Whatever her contributions, if any they are either lost or perhaps diffused in her commentaries. Like her father she is mostly remembered for her teaching.
The most detailed and reliable account of Hypatia's death is narrated by the historian socrates some twenty- five years later. There was considerable tension and rivalry especially between the Jews and the Christians of Alexandria. In those difficult times the prefect of Alexandria. Orestes and the Archibishop Cyril, known for his harsh way of dealing with the heretic Nestorius, opposed each other. Some monasteries in Nitria support Cyril, they accused Orestes for being a pagan and sacrifing to the Greek gods inspite of emperor Theodosius ban of all pagen cults. When a monked named Ammonius met his death by torture for hurling a stone at the prefect. Cyril and many moderate Christians found this action intolerable. The pro-Cyril mob turned against Orestes, Hypatia and close assocites of them.
With Cyril the head of the main religious body of the city and Orestes in charge of the civil government, a fight began over who controlled Alexandria. Orestes was a Christian, but he did not want to cede power to the church. The struggle for power reached its peak following a massacre of Christians by Jewish extremists, when Cyril led a crowd that expelled all Jews from the city and looted their homes and temples. Orestes protested to the Roman government in Constantinople. When Orestes refused Cyril’s attempts at reconciliation, Cyril’s monks tried unsuccessfully to assassinate him.
With Cyril the head of the main religious body of the city and Orestes in charge of the civil government, a fight began over who controlled Alexandria. Orestes was a Christian, but he did not want to cede power to the church. The struggle for power reached its peak following a massacre of Christians by Jewish extremists, when Cyril led a crowd that expelled all Jews from the city and looted their homes and temples. Orestes protested to the Roman government in Constantinople. When Orestes refused Cyril’s attempts at reconciliation, Cyril’s monks tried unsuccessfully to assassinate him.
Hypatia, however, was an easier target. She was a pagan who
publicly spoke about a non-Christian philosophy, Neoplatonism, and she was less
likely to be protected by guards than the now-prepared Orestes. A rumor spread
that she was preventing Orestes and Cyril from settling their differences. From
there, Peter the Lector and his mob took action and Hypatia met her tragic end.
It remains a matter of
vigorous debate how much the guilt of this atrocity is Cyril’s, but the affair
made Hypatia a powerful feminist symbol and a figure of affirmation for
intellectual endeavour in the face of ignorant prejudice. Her intellectual
accomplishments alone were quite sufficient to merit the preservation and
respect of her name, but sadly, the manner of her death added to it an even
greater emphasis.
No comments:
Post a Comment